Modus Operandi Korupsi dan Kaitannya dengan Aparatur Negara dalam Hadis-Hadis Nabi dan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia

H. Rajab

doi:10.29240/alquds.v5i1.1936

Modus Operandi Korupsi dan Kaitannya dengan Aparatur Negara dalam Hadis-Hadis Nabi dan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia

H. Rajab

Abstract

The Modus Operandi of Corruption and its Relation to the State Apparatus in the Prophet's Hadiths and Legislation in Indonesia

This paper aims to explain the modes of corruption and their relation to the state apparatus in the Prophet's traditions and legislation in Indonesia. So far, when many people talk about corruption, their memory is only of the laws that govern it, as if only the laws and regulations regulate corruption. In fact, long before the legislation was made, the Prophet, through his hadiths, have provided clues about corruption. This research is qualitative descriptive using a literature study that relies on library sources in the form of classic books, books, scientific journals, and other literature sources that are considered relevant. This study finds similarities between the Prophet's hadiths and Indonesian legislation in linking corruption (al-gulūl) to the state apparatus ('āmil) and that the modes of corruption are budget fraud, abuse of authority, embezzlement, and gratification and bribe. The mode then increases and develops with the times. Hopefully, through this writing, there will be awareness again that involvement in corruption is not only a violation of laws but also a violation of religious teachings and its legal consequences not only in the world but also in the hereafter.

Keywords

Corruption; al-Gulūl; state apparatus; mode

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-‘Abbād, Abd al-Muḥsin. Syarḥ Sunan Abī Dāwūd, n.d.

Al-Andalūsī, Ibn Hazm. Al-Muḥallā Bi al-Asar. Bairut: Dār al-Fikr, n.d.

Al-Athīr, Majduddīn ibn. Al-Nihāyat Fī Garīb al-Ḥadīth. XIII. Beirut: al-Maktabat al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1978.

Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad bin Ismā‘īl. Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. Damaskus: Dār Tūq al-Najāḥ, 1422.

Al-Fiqri, Ahmad. “ICW Ungkap Modus Favorit Koruptor Curi Uang Rakyat.” Alinea.Id, 2020. https://www.alinea.id/nasional/icw-ungkap-modus-favorit-koruptor-curi-uang-rakyat-b1ZIh9rCI.

Al-Madanī, Mālik bin Ănas. Muwaṭṭa’ al-Imām Mālik. Dār Ihyā al-Turāth al-Arabī, n.d.

Al-Naisabūrī, Abū Abdillāh al-Hākim. Al-Mustadrak Alā al-Ṣaḥīḥain. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 1990.

al-Nawawī, Abū Zakariyā. Al-Minhāj Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim Bin al-Ḥajjāj. II. Bairut: Dār Iḥyā al-Turāth al-Arabῑ, n.d.

al-Qarḍāwī, Yūsuf. Al-Halāl Wa al-Harām Fī al-Islām. Beirut: al-Maktabat al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1980.

Al-Shaibānī, Aḥmad bin Ḥanbal. Musnad Al-Imām Aḥmad Bin Ḥanbal. Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 2001.

Al-Sijistānī, Abū Dāwūd. Sunan Abī Dāwūd. Bairut: al-Maktabat al-Aṣriyyah, n.d.

Al-Tirmidhī, Muḥammad bin Isā Abū Isā. Sunan Al-Tirmidhī. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā al-Turāṡ al-Arabī, n.d.

Al-Uthaimīn, Muḥammad bin Ṣālih bin Muḥammad. Majmū’ al-Fatāwā Wa Rasāil Ibni Uthaimīn. Dār al-Waṭn, n.d.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2008.

Ḥamīd, Ṣāliḥ bin Abdillāh bin. Naḍrat Al-Na‘īm Fi Akhlāq al-Rasūl al-Karīm. XI. Jeddah: Dār al-Wasīlah, n.d.

Kadir, Yusrianto, and Roy Marthen Moonti. “Pencengahan Korupsi Dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa.” Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan) 6, no. 3 (2018): 431–42. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v6i3.583.

Kurniawan, Muhammad Rezza, and Pujiyono Pujiyono. “Modus Operandi Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah Oleh Pns.” Law Reform 14, no. 1 (2018): 115. doi:10.14710/lr.v14i1.20241.

Laoh, Clinten Trivo. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana White Collar Crime.” Lex Crimen VIII, no. 12 (2019): 82–89.

Mamalu, Jastianra. “Penggelapan Barang Sitaan Narkotika Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana.” Lex et Societatis II, no. 2 (2014): 15–22.

Manzur, Jamāluddīn Muḥammad bin Mukarram al-Ifrīqī al-Misrī Ibnu. Lisān Al-Arab. XI. Beirut: Dār al-Sādir, 1994.

Mardiana Arsjad. “Gratifikasi Pelayanan Seksual Sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Akta Yudisia 3, no. 1 (2018). doi:10.35334/ay.v3i1.988.

Nasution, Rasina Padeni. “Proyek Fiktif Sebagai Modus Korupsi Di Indonesia.” TAQNIN: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 2, no. 02 (2020): 53–65. doi:10.30821/taqnin.v2i02.8438.

Republik Indonesia. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” 1999, 1–30.

Santoso, Topo. “Menguak Relevansi Ketentuan Gratifikasi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 13, no. 3 (2013): 402–14.

Sasongko, Agus. “Menjadi Amil, Apa Syaratnya?” Republika.Co.Id, 2019. https://republika.co.id/berita/dunia-islam/wakaf/pnxs74313/menjadi-amil-apa-syaratnya.

Suhartono, Arif. “Subyek Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” 2012. http://jpuarifsuhartono.blogspot.com/2012/06/subyek-hukum-tindak-pidana-korupsi.html#:~:text=Subyek hukum adalah orang yang,adalah orang perseorangan termasuk korporasi.

Sumarwoto. “Status Hukum Bagi Koruptor Menurut Hukum Islam.” In Seminar Korupsi. Surakarta: Universitas Surakarta, 2014.

Syaifulloh, Abvianto. “Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law 1, no. 1 (2019): 47–64. doi:10.31960/ijocl.v1i1.147.

Syarif, Zainuddin. “Upaya Islam Dalam Membendung Budaya Korupsi.” KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 17, no. 1 (2010): 51–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v17i1.95.

Tambayong, Theresia C. “Profesionalisme Birokrasi Aparat Pemerintah Dalam Pelaksanaan Pelayanan Publik Di Kecamatan Tomohon Selatan Kota Tomohon.” Politico V, no. 1 (2016).

Triyanto, Gatot. “Ratio Legis Perbedaan Rumusan Delik Pasal 2 Dan Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Jo. Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” RECHTENS Volume VI (2017): 46–65.

Wibowo, Ari. “Penentuan Kriteria Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan).” Jurnal Yuridis 7, no. 1 (2020): 120–48. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v7i1.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v5i1.1936