Hermeneutika Pembebasan Farid Esack Dari Perspektif Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn

Ridani Faulika Permana; Sujiat Zubaidi; M. Adib Fuadi Nuriz; Usmanul Khakim; Fahman Mumtazi

doi:10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4244

Hermeneutika Pembebasan Farid Esack Dari Perspektif Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn

Ridani Faulika Permana, Sujiat Zubaidi, M. Adib Fuadi Nuriz, Usmanul Khakim, Fahman Mumtazi

Abstract

Farid Esack on Hermeneutic of Liberation from Thomas Kuhn’s Scientific Revolution Perspective

This article aims to elaborate on Farid Esack's Hermeneutic of Liberation from Thomas S Kuhn's scientific revolution perspective. The background of this study is the liberation of society from apartheid hegemony in South Africa in the 1949-1991 period; Farid Esack - from the beginning engaged in the practical political movement and now focuses on the scientific field - gave rise to new methodical ideas in the study of the Koran i.e hermeneutics of liberation; which is an effort to fight against racist rulers. From Kuhn's point of view, what Essack was doing was actually a scientific revolution. This assumption will be elaborated in this study. This study is a literature review using qualitative-content analysis as the data analysis technique. The results of this study are; first, his method of Qur'anic is a scientific revolution; which he supported the strengthening of the hermeneutical paradigm in the study of the Qur'an. In that way, secondly, as Kuhn requires that the new paradigm of scientific revolution must be supported by the scientific community, Farid Esack can be said to have a scientific community with Fazl Rahman, Hasan Hanafi, Mohamed Arkoun, Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid, etc. Thus, it is worth waiting for the success of this community revolution; to strengthen hermeneutics as a new paradigm in Qur'anic study in the future

Keywords

Farid Esack's Hermeneutics of Liberation; Kuhn's Scientific Revolution; Philosophy of Science; Scientific Community; Paradigm

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abidin, Ahmad Zainal. “Epistemologi Tafsir Al-Quran Farid Esack.” Teologia 24, no. 1 (2013): 1–22.

Achmad Khudori, Soleh, and Erik Sabti Rahmawati. Maulana Farid Esack: Hermeneutika Pembebasan Dan Relasi Antar Umat Beragama. Malang: UIN-Maliki Press, 2021.

Ahmed, Akbar S. Postmodernism and Islam: Predicament and Promise. Postmodernism and Islam: Predicament and Promise. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2003. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413593.

Al-Faruqi, Ismail Raji’. Islamization of Knowledge: Virginia: IIIT, 1988.

Al-Qathan, Manna’ Khalil. “Mabahits Fi ’Ulum Al-Qur’an.” Mesir: Maktabah Wahbah, 2000.

Al-Ta’an, Ahmad Idris. Al-’Almaniyyun Wa Al-Quran Al-Karim: Tarikhiyah Al-Nash. 1st ed. Damaskus: Dar Ibn Hazm, 2007.

Alifah Putri, Fia, and Wahyu Iskandar. “Paradigma Thomas Kuhn: Revolusi Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Pendidikan.” Nizhamiyah 10, no. 2 (2020): 6.

Bakar, Osman. Classification of Knowledge in Islam: A Study in Islamic Philosophies of Science. Islamic Texts Society. Cambridge: The Islamic Texts society, 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/1596114.

Damayanti, Septi Nur. “Epistemologi Saintifik Thomas S. Kuhn Terhadap Munculnya Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial.” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia 1, no. 3 (2019): 120. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v1i3.16192.

Effendi, Rahmat. “Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn: Perubahan Paradigma Dan Implikasi Dalam Bangunan Ilmu Keislaman.” Majalah Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Pemikiran Keagamaan Tajdid 23, no. 1 (2020): 47–61.

Erwiningsih, Winahyu. “Perkembangan Sains: Suatu Telaah Atas Pendekatan Paradigma Baru Thomas S. Kuhn.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 1 (2007): 68–86.

Esack, Farid. “Islam in Southern Africa : A Rejoinder to Nkrumah.” Review of African Political Economy, no. 53 (1992): 75–78.

———. On Being a Muslim: Finding a Religious Path in the World Today. Oneworld. Oxford: Oneworld, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137301291_5.

———. The Qur’an: A USer’s Guide. 2nd ed. Vol. 148. Oxford: One World, 2007.

———. “Three Islamic Strands in the South African Struggle for Justice.” Third World Quarterly 10, no. 2 (1988): 473–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436598808420068.

Farid Esack. But Musa Went to Fir-Aun!: A Compilation of Questions and Answers About the Role of Muslims in the South African Struggle for Liberation.Pdf. Maitland: Clyson Printers, 1989.

———. Qur’an, Liberation and Pluralism. Oxford: One World, 1997.

Farid, Pandangan, Esack Tentang, Tafsir Dan, and Zunly Nadia. “Pandangan Farid Esack Tentang Al-Qur’an, Tafsir Dan Takwil Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Bangunan Teologi Pembebasan.” Jurnal An Nur 4, no. 1 (2012): 1–18.

Fuad, Koento Wibisono, and P Hardono Hadi. “Kebenaran Ilmiah Dalam Pemikiran Thomas S. Kuhn Dan Karl R. Popper: Suatu Kajian Hermeneutika Dan Kontribusnya Bagi Masa Depan Ilmu.” Jurnal Filsafat 25, no. 2 (2015): 252–76.

Hafez, Nimat. “Book Review of : Qur’an and Woman by Amina Wadud-Muhsin,” no. January 1994 (2017).

Haqi, Muhammad Shafa Syaikh Ibrahim. ’Ulūm Al-Qur’an Min Khilāli Muqaddimāt Al-Tafāsīr. 1st ed. Beirut: al-Resalah Publisher, 2004.

Hassan Hanafi. Muqaddimah Fi ’Ilm Istighrab. Mesir: al-Dar al-Fanniyah, 1991.

Ihsan, Nur Hadi, and Dhita Ayomi Purwaningtyas. “Omid Safi’s Concept of Progressive Muslims.” Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam 17, no. 2 (2019).

Iswahyudi. “Dari Pewahyuan Progressif Menuju Tafsir Pembebasan : Telaah Atas Hermeneutika Al-Qur ’ an Farid Esack.” AL-Tahrir 11, no. 1 (2011): 77–97.

Jena, Yeremias. “T Homas k Uhn Tentang p Erkembangan s Ains Dan k Ritik l Arry l Audan,” 2012, 161–81.

Krippendoff, Klaus H. Content Analysis an Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publication. 2nd ed. Vol. 31. London, New Delhi: Sage Peblication, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.31.3460.

Kuhn, Thomas. The Stucture of Scientific Revolution. University of Chicago Press. Vol. 19. University: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

———. The Stucture of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.

Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago press, 2012.

Kuntowijoyo. Islam Sebagai Ilmu: Epistemologi, Metodologi Dan Etika. 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 2006.

———. Paradigma Islam. Bandung: Mizan, 2008.

Munir, Misbachul. “Hermeneutika Farid Esack.” Spiritualis 4, no. 2 (2018).

Muslih, Mohammad. Filsafat Ilmu: Kajian Atas Asumsi Dasar Paradigma Dan Kerangka Keilmuan. Yogyakarta: Belukar, 2016.

Muslih, Mohammad. Filsafat Ilmu; Kajian Atas Asumsi Dasar, Paradigma, Dan Kerangka Teori Ilmu Pengetahuan. Vol. 1. LESFI, 2004.

Muslih, Sujiat Zubaidi & Mohammad. “Bangunan Wacana Gender.” In Kritik Epistemologi & Model Pembacaan Kontemporer, edited by Mohammad Muslih, 2nd ed., 385. Yogyakarta: LESFI & Unida Gontor Press, 2013.

———. “Pemikiran Islam Kontemporer.” In Kritik Epistemologi & Model Pembacaan Kontemporer, edited by Mohammad Muslih, 2nd ed., 385. Yogyakarta: LESFI & UNIDA Gontor Press, 2013.

Mustamin, Kamaruddin, and Basri Basri. “Epistemologi Penafsiran Farid Esack Terhadap Ayat-Ayat Pembebasan.” Jurnal Ilmiah AL-Jauhari: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Interdisipliner 5, no. 2 (2020): 171–91. https://doi.org/10.30603/jiaj.v5i2.1767.

Muttaqin, Ahmad. “From Contextual Approach: Towards a Paradigm Shift in Interpreting the Qur’an.” Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith 11, no. 2 (2022): 203–30.

Nur Akhda Sbila. “Paradigma Dan Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas S. Kuhn Aspek Sosiologis, Antropologis, Dan Historis Dari Ilmu Pengetahuan.” Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 5, no. 1 (2019): 80–97.

Nurkhalis, -. “Konstruksi Teori Paradigma Thomas S. Kuhn.” Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura 11, no. 02 (2012): 79. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v11i02.55.

OKAWA, Reiko. “Contemporary Muslim Intellectuals Who Publish Tafsīr Works in English: The Authority of Interpreters of the Qur’ān.” Orient 48, no. 0 (2013): 57–77. https://doi.org/10.5356/orient.48.57.

Purba, Jhon Leonardo Presley, and Robinson Rimun. “Kritik Terhadap Metode Tafsir Hermeneutik Pembebasan Terhadap Peristiwa Keluaran Sebagai Suatu Bentuk Pembebasan.” Jurnal Teologi Amreta (ISSN: 2599-3100) 4, no. 2 (2021): 108–26. https://doi.org/10.54345/jta.v4i2.54.

Putri, Endrika Widdia, Universitas Islam, Negeri Imam, Bonjol Padang, Lingga Yuwana, Islamic Thought, Universitas Islam, Negeri Sunan, and Kalijaga Yogyakarta. “Epistemology of Thomas S . Kuhn ’ s Shifting Paradigm and Its Relevance to Islamic Science.” Khalifa: Journal of Islamic Education 4, no. 1 (2020): 1–18.

Rahman, Fazlur. Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Sabon, Max Boli. “Paradigma Hukum: Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu Rene Descartes, Auguste Comte, Thomas S Kuhn.” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 53, no. 9 (2019): 1689–99.

Sudarman. “Pemikiran Farid Esack Tentang Hermeneutika Pembebasan Al-Qur’an.” Al-Adyan 10, no. 1 (2017): 96.

———. “Pemikiran Farid Esack Tentang Hermeneutika Pembebasan Al-Qur’an.” Al-Adyan 10, no. 1 (2015): 83–98.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabetha, 2011.

Tavakoli, Hossein. A Dictionary of Research Methodology and Statistic in Aplied Linguistic,. Teheran: Rahma Press, 2012.

Ulya, Inayatul, and Nushan Abid. “Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn Dan Relevansinya Terhadap Keilmuan Islam.” Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah Dan Studi Keagamaan 3, no. 2 (2015): 249–76.

Zarkasyi, Hamid Fahmy. “Worldview Islam Sebagai Paradigma Sains Islam.” In Islamic Science, edited by Syamsuddin Arif. Jakarta: INSIST, 2016.

Zubaidi, Sujiat. “Antara Teodisi Dan Monoteisme: Memaknai Esensi Keadilan Ilahi.” Tsaqafah 7, no. 2 (2011): 247. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v7i2.2.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4244