Email this article 
Intertextuality in Qur’anic Studies: Ulum al-Qur'an Perspective on Utilization of the Bible in Qur'anic Interpretation
Abstract
In contemporary Qur'anic studies, a polemic has emerged regarding the use of the Bible as a reference to interpret the Qur'an, or what is categorized as intertextuality. This article aims to reveal the interpretive distortions that arise from the use of the Bible in interpreting the Qur'an by using the perspective of ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān. The methodology of this research is qualitative by using the literature method and using the content analysis approach to analyze the data. Through this methodology, it is found that some orientalists such as Michel Cuypers and Edip Yuksel often use the Bible in interpreting the Qur'an (intertextuality). In the perspective of ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān, this method of interpretation can be categorized as the use of isrā'īliyyāt in the interpretation of the Qur'an. However, it turns out that what the orientalists did was not in line with the rules of using isrā'īliyyāt itself. Therefore, the intertextuality done by the orientalists can be classified as al-dakhīl fī al-tafsīr (intrusion in interpretation). Ultimately, this method of interpretation is unacceptable, because it implies distortion of Qur'anic interpretation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adz-Dzahabī, M. Ḥusain. Al-Isrā’iliyyāt Fī Al-Tafsīr Wa Al-Ḥadīth. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1990.
Al-Bukhārī. Şaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. Riyāḍ: Dār as-Salām, 1997.
Al-Qurthubi, Ibn Abū Bakr. Al-Jami’ Li Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Beirut: Mu’assasah ar-Risalah, 2006.
Al-Ṭabarī. Jāmi’ Al-Bayān ’an Ta’wīl Ay Al-Qur’ān. 1st ed. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah, 1994.
Al-Zuhailī, Wahbah. At-Tafsīr Al-Munīr Fī Al-‘Aqīdah Wa Al-Sharī‘ah Wa Al-Manhaj. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, 2003.
Ali, Abdullah Yusuf. The Holy Quran: Text, Translation & Commentary. Lahore: Ripon Printing Press, 1938.
Allen, Graham. Intertextuality: The New Critical Idiom. New York: Routledge, 2011.
Andrews, W. L., A. N. Doane, and B. Draine. Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Edited by J. Clayton and E. Rothstein. London: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.
Arif, Syamsuddin. Orientalisme & Diabolisme Pemikiran. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2008.
Armas, Adnin. Metodologi Bibel Dalam Studi Al-Qur’an: Kajian Kritis. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2005.
Asiah, Siti. “Bibel Sebagai Sumber Tafsir Dalam Quran: A Reformist Translation (Studi Intertekstualitas Terhadap QS. Al-Baqarah).” UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2017.
Asnawi, A. R. “Penerapan Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA) Pada Surah Al-Qiyamah.” Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith 8, no. 1 (2018). http://jurnalfuf.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/mutawatir/article/view/1407.
Asnawi, A. R., and I. Idri. “Examining Semitic Rhetoric: A Qur’anic Sciences Perspective.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 28, no. 2 (2020). doi:https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v28i2.9898.
Azam, Azam. “The Irony Approach in the Qur’an: Mustansir Mir’s Perspective.” AJIS: Academic Journal of Islamic Studies 5, no. 1 (June 15, 2020): 21. doi:10.29240/ajis.v5i1.1318.
Bowering, G. “Recent Research on the Construction of the Qur’an.” In The Qur’an in Its Historical Context, edited by G. S. Reynolds. London: Routledge, 2008.
Cuypers, M. A Qur’ānic Apocalypse: A Reading of the Thirty –Three Last Sūrahs of the Qur’ān. Atlanta: Lockwood Press, 2018.
———. The Banquet: A Reading of the Fifth Sura of the Qur’an. Florida: Convivium Press, 2009.
———. The Composition of The Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.
Dan Cogliano. The King James Version of the Holy Bible. Brande: www.holybooks.com, 2004. https://www.holybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/The-Holy-Bible-King-James-Version.pdf.
Dardiri, Ahmadi Fathurrohman. “Bibel Sebagai Sumber Tafsir Al-Qur’an (Studi Pemikiran Mustansir Mir Dalam Understanding the Islamic Scripture: A Study of Selected Passages from the Qur’an).” UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2015.
Edmunds, Lowell. Intertextuality and The Reading of Roman Poetry. Maryland: JHU Press, 2001.
Fairclough, N. “Intertextuality in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Linguistics and Education, 4, no. 3–4 (1992).
Farquhar, J. N. An Outline of the Religious Literature of India. London: Oxford University Press, 1920.
Fina, L. I. N. “Membaca Metode Penafsiran Al-Qur’an Kontemporer Di Kalangan Sarjana Barat Analisis Pemikiran Angelika Neuwirth.” Ulumuna Jurnal Studi Keislaman 18, no. 2 (2014).
Fina, L. Iffah Naf’atu. “Survei Awal Studi Perbandingan Al-Qur’an Dan Bibel Dalam Kesarjanaan Barat Sebuah Perjalanan Menuju Intertekstualitas.” SUHUF 8, no. 1 (1970). doi:https://doi.org/10.22548/shf.v8i1.17.
Friedman, R. E. Who Write the Bible? New York: Perennial Library, 1989.
Geiger, A. Was Hat Mohammed Aus Dem Judenthume Aufgenommen? Bonn: Baaden, 1833.
Hornby, A. S., M. Ashby, and S. Wehmeier. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. http://archive.org/details/oxfordadvancedle00asho.
Imaduddin, Mujahid. “Dampak Liberalisasi Pemikiran Islam Terhadap Kehidupan Sosial.” Kalimah 15, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v15i1.837.
Kristeva, J. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980.
Matswah, A. “Menimbang Penafsiran Subjektivis Terhadap Al-Qur’an: Telaah Terhadap Penafsiran Edip Yuksel Dkk Dalam Quran: A Reformist Translation.” Jurnal Dialogia 12, no. 1 (2014).
———. “Reinterpretasi Ayat-Ayat Tentang Relasi Gender Dalam Keluarga: Analisis Terhadap Penafsiran Edip Yuksel, Dkk.” Jurnal Suhuf 7, no. 2 (2014).
Mir, Mustansir. Understanding the Islamic Scripture: A Study of Selected Passages from the Qur’an. London: Routledge, 2016.
Muhammady, Abdullah, Abu Bakar, Suqiyah Musafa’ah, and Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi. “Struktur Surat Al-Hijr Perspektif Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA).” Jurnal Reflektika 17, no. 2 (2022): 295–341.
Muslih, M Kholid, Muhamad Shofwan Muttaqin, and Amir Sahidin. “Konsep Historis Al- Qur ’ an Dalam Pandangan John Wansbrough: Sebuah Tinjauan Worldview Islam.” Al-Quds: Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 7, no. 2 (2023): 330–45. doi:10.29240/alquds.v7i1.5561.
Neuwirth, A., N. Sinai, and M. Max. “Intertexts by Verse.” Corpuscoranicum.De, 2007.
———. The Qur’an in Context. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
Neuwirth, Angelika. “Orientalism in Oriental Studies? Qur’anic Studies as a Case in Point.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 9, no. 2 (2007).
Nuriz, A. N., Saifullah A., Arif Maulana, A. Nurcholis, and K. Karomi. Problem Pluralisme Agama Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Keagamaan. Ponorogo: Centre for Islamic and Occidentalis Studies UNIDA Gontor, 2015.
Rahman, Z. A. “Angelika Neuwrth: Kajian Intertekstualitas Dalam QS. Al-Rahman Dan Mazmur 136.” Empirisma: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Kebudayaan Islam 24, no. 1 (2015). doi:https://doi.org/10.30762/empirisma.v24i1.12.
RI, Departemen Agama. Himpunan Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Agama RI, 2003.
Rochmawati, Nur Anis. “Bibel Sebagai Sumber Tafsir (Studi Inter-Tekstualitas Dalam The Holy Qur’an: Text, Translation And Commentary Karya Abdullah Yusuf Ali).” UIN Sunan Ampel, 2020.
———. “Cross Reference Terhadap Bibel Dalam The Holy Qur’an: Text, Translation, and Commmentary Karya Abdullah Yusuf Ali.” UIN Sunan Kalijaga 7, no. 2 (2021).
Rogers, T. “Intertextuality.” In Literacy in America: An Encyclopedia of History, Theory and Practice, edited by J. G. Guzzeti. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO Incompany, 2002.
Rusmana, D. Metode Penelitian Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2015.
Santoso, B. R., U. Baroroh, and A. D. Abdullah. “Surat Sebagai Media Dakwah: Studi Atas Praktek Dakwah Rasulullah Saw Terhadap Raja Heraclius, Kisra Abrawaiz, Muqouqis, Dan Najasyi.” Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah 35, no. 1 (2015).
Septiyani, V. I., and S. A. Sayuti. “Oposisi Dalam Novel ‘Rahuvana Tattwa’ Karya Agus Sunyoto: Analisis Intertekstual Julia Kristeva (Opposition in Agus Sunyoto’s ‘Rahuvana Tattwa’ Novel: Julia Kristeva’s Intertextual Analysis).” Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, Dan Budaya 9, no. 2 (2020). doi:https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.9.2.2019.174-186.
Shahrūr, M. Al-Kitāb Wa Al-Qur’ān: Qirā’ah Muā’şirah. Damaskus: Al-Ahālī li al-Ţabā’ah wa al-Nashr, n.d.
Taufiq, A. “Pemikiran Abdullah Ahmed An-Naim Tentang Dekonstruksi Syari’ah Sebagai Sebuah Solusi.” International Journal Ihya’ ’Ulum Al-Din 20, no. 2 (2018).
Thoha, Anis Malik. Tren Pluralisme Agama: Edisi Kritis. Jakarta: INSIST, 2021.
Tilawat, Anis. “Struktur Cincin Dalam Al-Qur’an (Perspektif Orientalis - Nicolai Sinai).” Nun 4, no. 2 (2018).
Ulinnuha, M. Metode Kritik Ad-Dakhil Fit-Tafsir. Jakarta: PT. Qaf Media Kreativa, 2019.
Wahbah Az-Zuhailī. Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī Wa Adillatuhu. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, 1984.
Yuksel, E., L. S. Al-Shaiban, and M. S Nafeh. Quran: A Reformist Translation. Tucson: Barinbow Press, 2007.
Zarkasyi, H. F. Liberalisasi Pemikiran Islam: Gerakan Bersama Missionaris, Orientalis Dan Kolonialis. Ponorogo: CIOS UNIDA Gontor, 2008.
Zarkasyi, H. F., A. Husaini, A. Armas, F. Salim, and M. A. Nasir. Pluralisme Agama: Telaah Kritis Cendekiawan Muslim. Jakarta: INSISTS, 2013.
Zulhamdani. “Homiletika Al-Qur’an: Refleksi Atas Pemikiran Gabriel Said Reynolds.” Khazanah Multidisiplin 4, no. 1 (2023): 50–70.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v8i2.8603
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Sujiat Zubaidi Saleh, Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi, Nurul Arifah Hilda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
INDEXED BY:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.