Metode Kritik Matan Hadis Dengan Pendekatan Alquran Dalam Kaidah Ilmu Naqd Al-Matan
Abstract
The Matan Hadith Criticism Method With the Qur'anic Approach in the Rules of Naqd Al-Matan Science
This article discusses how the position of al-Qur’ān in analyzing the prophet's hadith in studying the contents of the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad. The method of criticism of this hadith with the interpretation of the al-Qur'ān is not new, because starting from among the Companions like Āishah have already done it, then it becomes a reference for the next scholars. Hadith, which is seen as a source of reference for understanding the Qur'an, is a normative basis in determining legal arguments or statements, because the Prophet has full authority to explain the Koran, the provider of legal statements, and the Messenger of Allah also need to be obeyed and emulated as an ideal human being in applying the contents of al-Qur'ān. However, the hadiths that come from the Messenger of Allah need to be examined a lot because of the varying quality of hadiths so that it becomes a debate about the authenticity of the Messenger of Allah because the problem of the hadiths being different from the contents of the Qur'an, while the Messenger of Allah is unlikely to differ from the Qur'an. Therefore, the Naqd al-Matan method, 'Ilm Mukhtalaf al-Ḥadīṡ and textual contradiction analysis (‘Ilm ta'āraḍ az-Żāhirī) are the methods for analyzing the contradiction. So, the approach of al-Jamu' wa at-Taufīq (compromise), Nāsikh wa Mansūkh, and at-Tarjīḥ as a tool of analysis to find out the location of the problem from the hadith which contradicts al-Qur'ān and to take a common ground in accordance with the absolute truth of Allah from Rasulullah
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdel-Maguid, T. E., & Abdel-Halim, R. E. (2015). The Qur’ān and the development of rational thinking. Urology Annals, 7(2).
Abdillah, A., & Mampa, R. A. (2019). Kritik Matan Hadis dengan Pendekatan Al-Qur’an: Studi Pemahaman Muḥammad Al-Ghazālī dan Jamāl Al-Bannā. Refleksi, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v18i2.11272.
Abu Muhammad ‘Ali bin Ahmad bin Sa’id bin Hazm az-Zahiri. Al-Ihkam fi Ushul al-Ahkam, jilid. I. Beirut: Da>r al-Kutub al-‘ilmiyyah, 2010.
Abu al-Husain Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj. Sahih Muslim, Kitab al-Janaiz. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 2003.
Muhammad Ajjaj al-Khatib. as-Sunnah Qabla at-Tadwin. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1989.
Academy of Islamic Studies, University of Malaya, 2013. Akses 28 September 2017 darihttp://www.albayanjournal.com.
Andariati, L. (2020). Hadis dan Sejarah Perkembangannya. Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis, 4(2), 153-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v4i2.4680.
Al-Bukhari. Al-Jami’ as-Sahih. Tahqiq Muhibuddin al-Khatib. Jilid. IV (Kairo: Al-Maktabah as-Salafiyah, cet. 1, 1400 H.
‘Ali Hasan al-Halabi. An-Nukat ‘ala Nuzhah an-Nazar fi Tawdih Nukhbat al-Fikar. Dammam : Dar Ibn al-Jauzi’, cet. 1, 1413 H/1996 M.
As-Susuh, Abd al- Majid Muhammad Isma’il. Manhaj al-Taufiq wa at-Tarjih Baina al-Mukhtalaf al-Hadis wa Asaruhu fi al-Fiqh al-Islami. Kairo: Dar al-Nafais, t.t.
Asy-Syaukani. Irsyad al-Fuhul Ila Tahqiq al-Haq min ‘Ilm al-Usul. Jilid.I. Riyad: Dar al-Fadilah, cet. 1, 1421 H/2000.
Burhanuddin, B. (2018). Metode dalam memahami Hadis. Al-Mubarak: Jurnal Kajian Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 3(1), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47435/al-mubarak.v3i1.210.
Bustamin, M. Isa H. A. Salam. Metodologi Kritik Matan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
Darmalaksana, W. (2020). Penelitian Metode Syarah Hadis Pendekatan Kontemporer: Sebuah Panduan Skripsi, Tesis, Dan Disertasi. Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis, 5(1), 58-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v5i1.9468.
Hamzah al-Malibari. al-Hadis al-Ma’lul ; Qawaidun wa Dawabitun. Bairut: Dar ibn Hazm, 1996.
Hasan Fauzi Hasan al-Sa’idi. al-Manhaj an-Naqd ‘Inda al-Mutaqaddimin min al-Muhaddisina wa asar Tabayun al-Manhaj. Kairo: Tesis Jami ‘Ain Syams, 1993.
Ibnu Hajar. Nuzhatun Nazar Syarh Nukhbat al- Fikr. Riyad: tp, 2001.
Ibrahim Ibn Mus asy-Syatibi. al-Muwafaqat fi Ushul al- Ahkam, Juz. IV.Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, tt
Ibn Salah, Abu ‘Amr Usman, ‘Ulum al-Hadis Muqaddimah Ibn Al-Salah. tahqiq. Nuruddin ‘Itr. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, cet. 3, 1418 H
Jalal ad-Din As-Suyuti. Tadrib al-Rowi fi Syarh Taqrib an-Nawawi, Jilid. I. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Kautsar, 1994.
Kurniasih, A., & Alif, M. (2018). Metode Kritik Matan Hadis. Holistic Al-Hadis, 4(2), 42-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.32678/holistic.v4i2.3226.
Mahmud al-Tahhan, Taisir Mustalah al-Hadis. Iskandariyyah: Markazah al-Huda li ad-Dirasat, 1450 H.
Muhammad Mustafa al-A’zhami. Manhaj an-Naqd ‘Inda al-Muhaddisin –Nasy’atuhu Wa Tarikhuhu. Su’udiyyah: Maktabah al-Kausar, 1980.
Mustafa al-Siba’i. Al-Sunnah wa Makanatuha fi tasyri’ al-Islami. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islami, cet.3, 1402 H/1982 M.
Muhammad Amin Suma,”Hubungan Hadis dan Alquran: Tinjauan Segi Fungsi dan Makna”, dalam Yunahar Ilyas, et.al (ed.), Pengembangan Pemikiran Terhadap Hadis. Yogyakarta: LPPI Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, 1996.
Muhammad ibn Idris Asy-Syafi’i. ar-Risalah, tahqiq; Ahmad Muhammad Syakir. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, t.t.
-------------->, al-Umm. Tahqiq. Rif’at Fauzi ‘Abd al-Mutallib , Jilid VII. al-Man surah: Dar al-Wafa’, 2001.
Muhammad Abu Syuhbah. Difa’ ‘an as-Sunnah; wa radd al-Musytasriqin wa al-Kitab al-Mu’asirin. Kairo: Mujma’ al-Buhus al-Islami, 1985.
M. Quraish Shihab. Membumikan al-Qur’an . Bandung : Mizan. 1998.
Muqbil bin Hadi al-Wad’i. Rudud Ahl al-‘Ilm ‘ala al-Ta’inin fi Hadis as-Sihr. San’a: Dar al-Asar, Cet. 2, 1420 H/1999 M.
Musfir ’Azmullah ad-Damini. Maqayis Naqd Mutun as-Sunnah. Riyad:Jami’ al-Huquq, 1984.
Nafiz Husain Hammad. Mukhtalaf al-Hadis baina al-Fuqaha’ wa al-Muhaddisin. al-Mashurah: Dar al-Wafa’, cet. lbani. Silsilah al-Da’ifah wa al-Maudu’at. al-Maktabah al-Shamilah.
Nadhiran, H. (2017). Epistemologi Kritik Hadis. Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama, 18(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/jia.v18i2.2363.
Nizar Ali. 2001. Memahami Hadis Nabi (Metode dan Pendekatan). Yogyakarta: Center for Educational Studies and Development (CESaD) YPI Al-Rahmah.
Nizar Ali.. (Ringkasan Desertasi) Kontribusi Imam Nawawi dalam Penulisan Syarh Hadis, Yogyakarta.2000.
Nur ad-Din ‘Itr, Manhaj an-Naqd fi ‘Ulum al-Hadis. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 1988.
---------------------,Ulumul Hadis, terj. Mujiyono. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2012.
Pakeeza, S., & Chishti, A. A. (2012). Critical Study of Approaches to the Exegesis of the Holy Qur’an. Pakistan Journal of Islamic Research, 10(4), 19-26.
Salahuddin Ibn Ahmad al-Idlibi. Manhaj Naqd al-Matan ‘inda ‘Ulama’ al-Hadis an-Nabawi. Beirut: Dar al-‘Afaq al-Jadid, 1983’.
Sukron Kamil. Naqd Al-Hadis. terj. Metode Kritik Sanad dan Matan Hadis. Pusat Penelitian Islam Al-Huda, 2000.
Sulaiman bin Muhammad al-Dabikh. Ahadis al-Aqidah Allati Yuham Zahiruha al-Ta’arud fi Sahihain; Dirasatun wa Tarjih. Taif: Dar al-Bayan al-Hadisiyah, cet.1, 1422 H/2001 M.
Suryadilaga, M. A. Metodologi Syarah Hadis. Yogyakarta: SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2012.
Syaraf al-Qudah. “Hal Yata’aradu al-Hadis ma’a al-Qur’an al-Karim aw al-‘Ilm Hadis ”Khalaqallah al-Turab Yaum as-Sabt.” Jurnal al-Bayan” Department of al-Qur’an and al-Hadith.
Usman ‘Ali Hasan. Qawa’id al-Istidlal ‘ala Masa’il al-I’tiqad. Riyad: Dar al-Watan, vol.2, cet. 1, 1413 H.
Wahbah al-Zuhaili, Al-Wajiz fi Usul al-Fiqh. Beirut : Dar al-Fikr al-Mu’asir, 1419 H/1999 M.
Wahbah al-Zuhaili. Al-Wajiz fi Us}ul al-Fiqh. Beirut : Dar al-Fikr al-Mu’asir, M.1419 H/1999.
Yusuf al-Qardawi, Kaifa Nata’a>mal ma’a al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyah. Kairo: Dar al-Syuruq, cet. 2, 1423 H/2002 M.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4041
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Qomarullah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
INDEXED BY:
Al Quds's Visitors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.