Avoiding Mistakes in Understanding the Hadith of Prophet Muhammad SAW with Yūsuf Qaraḍāwī's Hermeneutics

Kamarudin Kamarudin; Suprijati Sarib; Juhrah M. Arib; Sudarmadi Putra; Rahman Rahman

doi:10.29240/alquds.v7i1.5874

Avoiding Mistakes in Understanding the Hadith of Prophet Muhammad SAW with Yūsuf Qaraḍāwī's Hermeneutics

Kamarudin Kamarudin, Suprijati Sarib, Juhrah M. Arib, Sudarmadi Putra, Rahman Rahman

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the methodology for understanding hadīth according to Yūsuf Qaraḍāwī. This study uses library research methods to analyze data. The primary data are Qaraḍāwī's work, while the secondary data are books and journal articles relevant to the topic of this study. The results of this study indicate that Qaraḍāwī offers eight steps to understanding hadīth, namely defining hadīth based on the Qur'ān, collecting hadīth thematically, compromising contradictory hadīths, identifying asbāb al-wurūd of the hadīth, distinguishing changing and unchanging means, differentiating between the literal and figurative language (majāz), recognizing the unseen and the real, and confirming the meaning of the words in the hadīth. Some points that must be avoided in interacting with ṣunnāh are the interpretation of the ignorant, the deviation of the extremes, and the manipulation of the heretics. Furthermore, the basic principles in interacting with ṣunnāh are examining the validity of hadīth based on the scientific principles established by hadīth experts, understanding the editorial hadīth properly according to the language instructions and the context of the hadīth, and ensuring that the matān of the hadīth does not conflict with the nāsh of the Qur'an or other hadīth with a more powerful position

Keywords

hadīth understanding; hermeneutics; methodology; Yūsuf Qaraḍāwī

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdul, Abu Hassan, and Wahibah Twahir. “The Disciplinary Issues in Malay Figurative Language and Its Similarities with Majaz Concept of the Arabic Rhetoric.” European Journal of Language and Literature 4, no. 1 (April 30, 2016): 47. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejls.v4i1.p47-55.

Abu-Alabbas, Belal. “The Principles of Hadīth Criticism in the Writings of Al-Shāfiʿī and Muslim.” Islamic Law and Society 24, no. 4 (October 3, 2017): 311–35. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00244P01.

Ainurrofiq, Faiq. “The Use of Hermeneutics Double Movement Fazlūr Raḥmān in Comprehending Hadīth of the Unsuccessful Leadership of Women.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 27, no. 2 (December 31, 2019): 132–44. https://doi.org/10.24014/JUSH.V27I2.6719.

Al-‘Asqalānī, Ibn Hajar. Fath Al-Bārī Syarh Shahīh Al-Bukhārī. Kairo: Dār al-Bayan al-‘Arabi, 2007.

Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl. Al-Jāmi’ Al-Musnad Ash-Shahīh Al-Mukhtashar Min Umūr Rasūlillāh Shallāllāhu ‘Alaihi Wa Sallama Wa Sunanihi Wa Ayyāmihi. Mesir: Dār Thoqu An-Najah, 1422.

Al-Hajjaj, Abū Husein Muslim bin. Shahīh Al-Mūslīm. Beīrūt: Dār al-Fīkr, 2011.

Al-Khaṭib, Muhammad ‘Ajjāj. Uṣhūl Al-Ḥadīth: ‘Ulūmuhū Wa Muṣhṭalāḥūh. Beīrūt: Dār al-Fīkr, 2006.

Alshehri, Mohammed Salem. “Western Works and Views On Hadith: Beginnings, Nature, and Impact.” Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 46, no. 46 (January 6, 2015): 203–24. https://doi.org/10.15370/muifd.41804.

Amir, Hamzah, Achyar Nasution, and Ardiansyah Zein. “Kontribusi Pemikiran Yūsuf Qaraḍāwī Dalam Kitāb Kaifa Nata’āmal Ma’a Al-Ṣunnāh Al-Nabāwiyyāh.” AT-TAHDIS: Journal of Hadith Studies 1, no. 1 (March 31, 2017): 141–57. http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/attahdits/article/view/651.

Arib, Juhrah M., Nikmatul Khairiyah, M. Suryadinata, and Sabil Mokodenseho. “The Inheritance of Human Traits in the Qur’an Based on the Scientific Interpretation of Zaghlūl Rāghib Muḥammad an-Najjār.” AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 6, no. 2 (September 17, 2022): 863–86. https://doi.org/10.29240/ALQUDS.V6I2.4199.

Awad, Khaled M., Mustafa El-Nainay, Mohammad Abdeen, Marwan Torki, Omar Saif, and Emad Nabil. “A Secure Blockchain Framework for Storing Historical Text: A Case Study of the Holy Hadith.” Computers 11, no. 42 (March 14, 2022): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11030042.

Boullata, Issa J. “Studies in the Majiiz and Metaphorical Language of the Qur’an: Abu ’Ubayda and Al-Sharif Al-Racli.” In Literary Structures of Religious Meaning in the Qu’ran, 317–60. Routledge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203037041-24.

Caeiro, Alexandre, and Mahmoud Al-Saify. “Qaraḍāwī in Europe, Europe in Qaradāwī.” In Global Mufti, The Phenomenon of Yūsuf Al-Qaraḍāwī, edited by Bettina Gräf and Jakob Skovgaard-Petersen. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.

El-Wereny, Mahmud. “Tajdīd Ad-Dīn: Islam and the Question of Renewal in the Thought of Yūsuf Al-Qaraḍāwī.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology (IJPT) 5, no. 2 (2017): 20–34. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijpt.v5n2a3.

Gräf, Bettina. “Sheikh Yūsuf Al-Qaraḍāwī in Cyberspace.” Die Welt Des Islams 47, no. 3 (2007): 403–21. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006007783237464.

Hamisan@khair, Nur Saadah, and Nurdina Mohd Dahlan. “The Debate on Anti-Woman Discourse in the Hadīth Literature.” Journal Of Hadith Studies 2, no. 1 (June 15, 2017): 2550–1448. https://doi.org/10.33102/JOHS.V2I1.9.

Handika, Caca. “Pemahaman Hadīth Yūsuf Qaraḍāwī Dalam Menentukan Hukum Islam.” Al-Mawarid 1, no. 2 (August 20, 2019): 164–78. https://doi.org/10.20885/MAWARID.VOL1.ISS2.ART4.

Haq, Sansan Ziaul, and Asep Salahudin. “Moderasi ‘Di Atas’ Tekstualisme-Kontekstualisme: Metodologi Pemahaman Ṣunnāh Yūsuf Al-Qaraḍāwī.” AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 6, no. 3 (October 1, 2022): 965–86. https://doi.org/10.29240/ALQUDS.V6I3.4057.

Harb, Lara. “Arabic Literary Theory.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. Oxford University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.989.

Hassan, Said Fares. “Yūsuf Al-Qaraḍāwī: An Ideologue for Muslim Minorities.” In Fiqh Al-Aqalliyyāt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137350091_4.

Imārah, Muhammad. Al-Duktūr Yūsuf Al-Qaraḍāwi Madrasah Fikriyyah Wa Al-Mashrū Al-Fikri. Kairo: Dār al-Salām, 2004.

———. Al-Syeikh Muhammad Al-Gazāli Al-Mauqi’ Al-Fikri Wa Al-Ma’ārik Al-Fikriyah. Kairo: al-Haiah al-Mishriyyah al-‘Ammah li al-Kitāb, 1992.

Isma’il, H. M. Syuhudi. Hadīth Nabi Yang Tekstual Dan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1994.

Izza, Farah Nuril. “Hermeneutika: Arah Baru Interpretasi Hadīth (Studi Analisis Pemikiran Yūsuf Al-Qaraḍāwī Dalam Fatwa-Fatwanya).” Komunika 8, no. 2 (January 1, 2014): 192–220. https://doi.org/10.24090/KOMUNIKA.V8I2.756.

Kamarudin, Kamarudin, and Sabil Mokodenseho. “A Debate on the Islamic Practice of Pilgrimage to the Grave: Study of the Hadīth on Grave Pilgrimage for Women.” AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 6, no. 2 (August 9, 2022): 495–510. https://doi.org/10.29240/ALQUDS.V6I2.4390.

Kementerian Agama RI. Al-Qur’ān Dan Terjemah. Surabaya: Lentera Optima Pustaka, 2011.

Khoiri, M. Alim. “Interaksi Dan Pemahaman Hadīth: Telaah Hermeneutis Pemikiran Yūsuf Al-Qaraḍāwī,.” Universum: Jurnal Keislaman Dan Kebudayaan 12, no. 1 (January 31, 2019): 33–45. https://doi.org/10.30762/universum.v12i1.1059.

Krämer, Gudrun. Makers of the Muslim World: Hasān Al-Bannā. London: Oneworld Publications, 2010.

Miski, Miski. “False Hadith, Identity, and Contestation of Thought: The Analysis of Hadith on the Division of Muhammad’s Ummah in the Historical Dimension.” Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 25, no. 1 (July 1, 2021): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.29300/MADANIA.V25I1.4246.

Mohamed, Emad, and Raheem Sarwar. “Linguistic Features Evaluation for Hadīth Authenticity through Automatic Machine Learning.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 37, no. 3 (August 23, 2022): 830–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/LLC/FQAB092.

Mukhibat, M. “The Teaching Management and Study of Hadith: Method, Contents, and Approaches.” Utopia y Praxis Latioamericana, no. 24 (2019): 153–62.

Mūslīm, Imām. Shahīh Mūslīm. IV. Mesir: Isā al-Bābī al-Halabī, n.d.

Muthalib, Abdul Razak Abd, and Basri Ibrahim. “Methods for Understanding of Prophet’s Hadis: Application Towards Hadis of Jihad.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 10, no. 4 (April 12, 2020): 380–95. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i4/7141.

Patel, Youshaa. “‘Whoever Imitates a People Becomes One of Them’: A Hadīth and Its Interpreters.” Islamic Law and Society 25, no. 4 (October 19, 2018): 359–426. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00254A01.

Qaraḍāwī, Yūsuf. Al-‘Aql Wa Al-‘Ilm Fī Al-Qurān Al-Karīm. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1996.

———. Al-Halāl Wa Al-Harām Fi Al-Islām. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1993.

———. Al-Īmān Wa Al-Hayāt. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1996.

———. Buyū Al-Murābaḥah Li Al-‘Āmir Bi Al-Shira’ Kama Tajrīḥī Al-Maṣārif Al-Islāmiyyah. Beīrūt: Maktabah Wahbah, 1987.

———. Dawr Al-Qiyam Wa Al-Akhlāq Fī Al-Iqtiṣād Al-Islāmī. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1995.

———. Dawr Al-Zakāh Fī ‘Ilāj Al-Musykilāt Al-Iqtisādiyyah Wa Syurūth Najāhihā. Kairo: Dār al-Syurūq, 2001.

———. Fī Fiqh Al-Awlawīyāt: Dirāsah Jadīdah Fī Ḍawʼ Al-Qurʼān Wa-Al-Sunnah. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1995.

———. Fiqhu Al-Ṣiyām. Kairo: Dār ash-Shuhut, 1991.

———. Hady Al-Islām, Fatāwá Muʻāṣirah. Kairo: Dār Āfāq al-Ghad, 1981.

———. Ibn Al-Qarya Wa-l-Kuttāb: Malamih Sira Wa-Masira. I. Kairo: Dār al-Syurūq, 2004.

———. Ibn Al-Qarya Wa-l-Kuttāb: Malamih Sira Wa-Masira. III. Kairo: Dār al-Syurūq, 2006.

———. Kaifa Nata’āmal Ma’a Al- Ṣunnāh Al-Nabāwiyyāh. Kairo: Dār al-Syurūq, 2002.

———. Kaifa Nata’āmal Ma’a Al- Ṣunnāh Al-Nabāwiyyāh. 2nd ed. Kairo: Dār al-Syurūq, 2005.

———. Kenanganku Bersama Ikhwanul Muslimin, Terj., M. Lili Nur Aulia. Jakarta: Aulia Publisher, 2003.

———. Madkhal Li Dirāsah Al-Sharīᶜah Al-Islāmiyah. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2001.

———. Madkhal Li Ma’rifati Al-Islām Muqawwimātuhū: Khaṣāisuhū, Ahdāfuhu, Maṣādiruhū. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1996.

———. Mauqifu Al-Islām Mina Al-Ilhām Wa Al-Kashfi, Wa Al-Ra’yi, Wa Mina Al-Tamām Wa Al-Kahanah Wa Al-Ruqa. Mesir: Maktabah Wahbah, 2004.

———. Prioritas Gerakan Islam: Antisipasi Masa Depan Gerakan Islam, Terj., A. Najiyulloh. Jakarta: Al Ishlahy Press, 1993.

———. Sharī’atu Al-Islām: Ṣālihat Li Al-Tatbīq Fi Kulli Zamān Wa Makān. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1977.

Rahman, Rosfazila Abd, Abdul Razif Zaini, and Abur Hamdi Usman. “Hadith, Common Historical Method in Islam and Meta Theory in Sociology: Transcending the Islamic Heritage.” In The Reality of Urban Heritage Sites in the Arab World Approaches and Experiences, 316–28. Berlin: The Arab Democratic Center Berlin, 2021.

Rohmansyah, Rohmansyah. “Elasticity of Understanding of M. Syuhudi Ismail on Hadith About the Threats for Painter.” ADDIN 13, no. 2 (August 1, 2019): 271–94. https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v13i2.6263.

Saloot, Mohammad Arshi, Norisma Idris, Rohana Mahmud, Salinah Ja’afar, Dirk Thorleuchter, and Abdullah Gani. “Hadīth Data Mining and Classification: A Comparative Analysis.” Artificial Intelligence Review 46, no. 1 (June 1, 2016): 113–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10462-016-9458-X/METRICS.

Skovgaard-Petersen, Jakob. “Yūsuf Al-Qaraḍāwī and Al-Azhar.” In Global Mufti, edited by Bettina Gräf and Jakob Skovgaard-Petersen, 27–54. London, New York: Hirst & Columbia University Press, 2009.

Syarkun, Mif Rohim N. “The Influence of Prophet Muhammad’s Thought on Ijtihad.” Sains Humanika 8, no. 3–2 (August 16, 2016): 117–123. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v8n3-2.973.

Tajuddin, Tabrani, and Neny Muthiatul Awwaliyyah. “Hermeneutika Yūsuf Qaraḍāwī Dalam Kitab Kaifa Nata’āmal Al- Ṣunnāh Al-Nabāwiyyāh Ma’alim Wa Dawabit.” Al-Mutsla 3, no. 1 (June 30, 2021): 29–43. https://doi.org/10.46870/JSTAIN.V3I1.47.

Tujang, Bisri. “Hermeneutika Hadīth Yūsuf Qaraḍāwī (Studi Analisa Terhadap Metodologi Interpretasi Qaraḍāwī).” Al-Majaalis 2, no. 1 (November 20, 2014): 33–68. https://doi.org/10.37397/ALMAJAALIS.V2I1.21.

Usman, Abur Hamdi, Nazneen Ismail, Zainora Daud, and Rosni Wazir. “Interaction with Prophetic Tradition: A Review of Al-Qaraḍāwī’s Thought.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 7, no. 1 (2016): 547–54. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n1p547.

Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. “Maghāzī and the Muḥaddithūn : Reconsidering the Treatment of ‘Historical’ Materials in Early Collections of Hadith.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 28, no. 1 (February 23, 1996): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743800062759.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v7i1.5874